March EDI Corner - Advancing Equity by Incorporating Intersectionality

An individual’s social identity may include different elements such as the commonly acknowledged variables of race and ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status, sexuality, nationality and citizenship status, and disability status. As dental public health professionals, we understand that these factors are associated with health status and access to care. However, the majority of oral health research continues to focus on particular elements affecting oral health and access to care without examining the interrelationship between different elements of an individual’s identity. Intersectionality, as defined below, is a lens for studying the social determinants of health, reducing health disparities, and promoting health equity and social justice (Lopez and Gadsden, 2016).

What is “intersectionality”?

Intersectionality is a theoretical research framework that acknowledges that people belong to more than one group and, consequently, may experience overlapping health and social inequities. Acknowledging the existence of multiple intersecting identities is an initial step in understanding the complexities of health disparities for populations from multiple historically oppressed groups. By incorporating intersectionality theory into oral health research and practice we promote a deeper understanding of the development of oral health inequities and advance population oral health. An intersectional public health lens embraces the heterogeneity of people’s lived experiences.

 

The figures above are from “Advancing Equity by Incorporating Intersectionality in Research and Analysis,” by Mbah O, Sevak P, et al. Washington, District of Columbia: 2022.

History of intersectionality

The term was first coined in 1991 but its roots can be traced back to Black feminism in the U.S. as championed by Sojourner Truth’s “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech in 1851. She deconstructed the notion that race, ethnicity, and gender were mutually exclusive.

In dental public health, we might consider intersections between identities such as:

  • Black, Hispanic, American Indian or Indigenous or Native American, Alaska Native, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and other persons of color
  • Members of religious groups
  • LGBTQAI+ persons
  • Persons living with disabilities
  • Persons living in rural areas
  • Persons adversely affected by poverty or persistent inequality

Planning oral health research with an intersectional framework

Intersectional theory is often found in conventional oral health research under the banner of inequality research. Numerous studies have examined connections between social identities and oral health inequalities, showing most disadvantaged members of society bear the greatest burden of poor oral health. However, these groups are continually theorized as homogenized collectives. Using both quantitative and qualitative data sources that include people with intersecting identities may lead to a deeper understanding of the contextual factors driving inequities.

Strategies for incorporating intersectionality in oral health research include:

  • Engage people with lived experience not only as research participants but also as contributors and co-developers of the research design, data collection, analysis, and reporting processes. Approaches such as participatory action research (PAR), community-based participatory research (CBPR), and culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) are best practices for collaborating meaningfully with individuals with lived experience. Participatory research methods can be used to identify relevant research questions by involving and engaging participants and stakeholders.
  • Develop research questions and data collection plans that address intersectionality
  • Obtain additional training to overcome potential knowledge and skills deficits
  • Seek multidisciplinary research collaborations
  • In quantitative analyses, standard statistical models can be used to estimate outcomes of interest or construct models that address intersectionality. In multivariable regression analyses, interaction terms can be used to examine how two or more factors (i.e. race and gender) interact to produce an outcome. Considerations include whether certain information is collected and measured as well as sample size considerations for subgroups. Analyses may not be possible if there are insufficient numbers of participants from marginalized groups to allow comparisons and if information is not collected about different social identities to enable detailed explorations of intersections.
  • Many intersectionality researchers feel that qualitative and mixed methods research is preferable to quantitative research alone. Qualitative analyses can help us achieve a deeper understanding of the experiences, barriers, and assets of groups with various intersecting identities. This type of research may also be used to corroborate or refute quantitative results and explain factors that could be at play. It is important to note that historically in oral health research, there are many fewer qualitative research studies than quantitative.

Adopting an intersectionality framework

Intersectionality poses research questions that seek to understand the complex experiences of people, reflecting their lived realities, thereby overcoming the limitations of the mainstream simplistic single-variable oral health inequality research. Intersectionality research instead aims to unpack how multiple social identities simultaneously impact an individual’s oral health. Adopting an intersectional framework enables us to identify populations who are more likely to be a target of stigma, experience exclusion from dental services, likely to self-stigmatize, and disengage from services.

Resources:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. “Advancing Equity by Incorporating Intersectionality in Research and Analysis,” by Mbah O, Sevak P, et al. Washington, District of Columbia: 2022.

Muirhead EV, Milner A, Freeman R, Doughty J, Macdonald ME. What is intersectionality and why is it important in oral health research? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48(6):464-470.

Bowleg L. Evolving intersectionality within public health: From analysis to action. Am J Public Health. 2021;111(1):88-90.

Lopez N, Gadsden VL. Health inequities, social determinants, and intersectionality. Discussion paper, National Academy of Medicine, Washington, D.C., 2016.